I don’t understand why this merger has come down to essentially a party line vote. The Democratic commissioners at the FCC are forgetting what satellite radio has done for left leaning viewpoints.

Last week, Democratic commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said he would vote for the deal if the companies agree to extend their price cap to six years and set aside more channels for educational and minority-owned stations.

However, the companies rejected that overture and on Wednesday, Mr. Adelstein voted against the deal, saying he had hoped for a “bipartisan solution” but that the agency’s Republican commissioners, who all voted for the deal, appeared more interested in approving “a monopoly with window dressing” for conditions.

FCC Commissioners Set To Approve XM-Sirius Deal – WSJ.com

Let us remember the current state of commercial talk radio. It is dominated by white conservative males for the most part. Do we hear a lot of minority, GLBT, or liberal viewpoints? Hardly. Big media corporations are leery of taking a chance on things like that.

So, what has happened as a result is we now have the likes of Neil Boortz, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity dominating the talk radio circuit. Essentially, thats what most people are hearing these days.

Liberals have been shut out. However, satellite radio has given liberal talk a chance. Take example Air America Radio: without XM the network would have limited coverage in big cities. Instead, it now has national coverage.

Female viewpoints are heard loud and clear through female-centric channels on both services. XM has a show from the Human Rights Campaign on GLBT issues — Sirius has an entire channel. Minorities are represented well on both services — I can count about a half-dozen on each service AT LEAST that target these audiences.

Adelstein’s excuse to not vote for this was a copout. If anything, this merger will help diversify viewpoints than silence them. It’s a shame this merger had to turn into a partisan issue.

Seems as if we have moved one step closer to a combined satellite radio provider today with the shareholder approval from both XM and Sirius by near unanimous margins Tuesday.

What seemed as an impossibility at it’s initial announcement seems a near certainty now. It’s been somewhat amusing to watch the National Association of Broadcasters do just about everything it could to prevent this from happening.

The argument was that it would be a monopoly, which I guess by the true definition of the word, it would be. But a monopoly on what? Music? Hardly. With a combined 16 million subscribers, it is but a small segment of the overall industry.

As an XM subscriber myself, it is quite frustrating to be locked out of certain programming just because I choose not to subscribe to both services (some do!). If anything, the split has hurt the satellite radio industry, as unlike cable vs. DirecTV/DISH, you can’t just switch and still get the same content. Stern is only only the big dog. Baseball — arguably the only sport that lends itself to radio well — is exclusive to XM, and so on.

For many of us, paying an additional $12.95 just for a few more channels we’d like to hear is nothing short of ludicrous. The NAB has seemed to argue that it somehow puts them at a disadvantage, which I think is silly — your content is free, whereas its pay-to-play with satellite radio. SatRad will never replace good old fashioned local content, and for the most part you folks have already killed local radio, so what does it matter? :)

Investors are already salivating over the potential money-making opportunities, of which XM+Sirius CEO-to-be Mel Karmazin has already gone on the record saying it would save “billions.”

Look at todays stock prices — after the approvals, XM shot up 10 percent, and Sirius 6.5 percent. Even further, look into the options — where investors speculate on future prices. In both stocks, the number of “calls” (those betting the price will go up) are far outpacing the “puts” (those betting it will go down).

There’s a sense of inevitability on Wall Street… and most times that is a good barometer of what will happen. Investors are confident that the DOJ and FCC will let the merger go through. Having the FCC chief who formulated the rules of the spectrum licenses on your side doesn’t hurt, either.

But I’m betting the NAB is liking SatRad in its weakened, vulnerable state… makes it easier for them to control the industry overall.

This needs to happen now. I fail to see anything that should prevent this merger from going through: its a win-win situation for consumers, especially those who have been pushing for a la carte programming for years (hey cable TV, are you listening?)

More: BetaNews | XM Shareholders Approve Sirius Merger

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.